Why thymine instead of uracil?

by Piter Kehoma Boll

ResearchBlogging.org About a year ago, while I was in my class of Techniques of Molecular Diagnosis, an interesting doubt sprouted: why does DNA use thymine instead of uracil as RNA does?

I hope everybody reading this knows about nucleic acids and the difference between DNA and RNA. As a very quick review:

RNA (ribonucleic acid) is a polymer made of ribonucleotides, compound molecules made of three parts, or smaller molecules: a nitrogenous base (adenine, uracil, cytosine or guanine), a ribose sugar and a phosphate group.

DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) is similar, but instead of uracil it has thymine, and instead of a ribose sugar is has a deoxyribose, so that it is made of deoxyribonucleotides. Another difference is that DNA is a double chain twisted helicoidally, where two nitrogenous bases (each from one of the chains) are connected. Adenine is always connected to thymine and cytosine always to guanine, so that one chain is always dependent on the other.

Currently it’s highly accepted that RNA was the first nucleic acid to exist and that DNA evolved from it, so the changes in the sugar and one of the nitrogenous bases must have some advantage.

To understand that, let’s take a look at the structure of the uracil:


The only difference between it and thymine is the presence of a methyl group at the last one:


In fact, thymine is also called 5-methyluracil. But let’s go to the explanation:

While nucleotides are synthesized, the nucleotide-monophosphates (NMPs), i.e., the set nitrogenous base + sugar + phosphate is dehydroxylated, creating 2’-deoxy-nucleotide-monophosphate (dNMPs), i.e., GMP, AMP, CMP and UMP (for guanine, adenine, cytosine and uracil) are changed to dGMP, dAMP, dCMP and dUMP.

This modification by dehydroxylation has been shown to make the phosphodiester bonds (the bonds of phosphates on the sugar) less susceptible to hydrolysis and damage by UV radiation. It assures that a DNA molecule will not be as easy to be broken as an RNA molecule, which is very useful since DNA carries all the information to build up the organism.

After the dehydroxilation of the nucleotide-monophosphates, the next step, catalyzed by folic acid, add a methyl group to the uracil to form a thymine, so turning dUMP into dTMP.

There are many explanations for that:

1. Despite uracil’s tendency to pair with adenine, it can also pair with any other base, including itself. By adding a methyl group (which is hydrophobic) and turning it into thymine, its position is reorganized in the double-helix, not allowing those wrong pairings to happen.

2. Cytosine can deaminate to produce uracil. You can see in the picture below that the only difference between them is the change from an O in uracil to an NH2 in cytosine. The problem is that, if uracil were a component of DNA, the repair systems would not be able to distinguish original uracil from uracil originated by deamination of cytosine. So using thymine instead makes it way easier and more stable, as any uracil inside DNA must come from a cytosine and so it can be replaced by a new cytosine.


This didn’t evolve for that purpose, of course. Evolution cannot predict what happens. Probably during the earliest times of life, eventually an error changed uracil for thymine and it was found to be more stable to carry information, since such a molecule wouldn’t be destroyed so easily and thus would succeed in passing its “layout” to the next generation.

It makes me wonder… Could some alien life form have found an alternative way to deal with RNA’s (or something equivalent) instability?

– – –

Main Reference:

Jonsson, J. (1996). The Evolutionary Transition from Uracil to Thymine Balances the Genetic Code Journal of Chemometrics, 10, 163-170 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199603)10:2


Filed under Evolution, Molecular Biology

17 responses to “Why thymine instead of uracil?

  1. Great discussion. Also an interesting topic that I’ve never actually gone so far as to look up to see what’s been proposed. I’d definitely like to reblog this on my site where my students can read it if you don’t mind.

  2. Reblogged this on DownHouseSoftware and commented:
    An interesting look into why DNA and RNA might use different nucleic acids for what seems to be essentially the same purpose (namely Thymine and Uracil).

  3. Thank you so much for this information :) it helped me a lot with for genetics homework!

  4. MUCH satisfying explanation thanx it helped me!!

  5. Patricie

    Hi! Very nice post, it helped me a lot.
    Just a question – when I googled it, it says everywhere that RNA is actually more stable that DNA while suffering UV radiation. But here you say that dNTPs are less susceptible to damages by UV than NTPs .. So how is it?

    • Piter Keo

      Thank you for your comment.
      Abour your question, I think the point is that deoxyribose is more stable than ribose because a C-H bond is more stable than a C-OH bond. So a single nucleotide of DNA is more stable than its RNA counterpart, but the whole chain forming a molecule of DNA is less stable than RNA when dealing with UV radiation.

  6. AJAY Kumar

    Very nice discussion…it help me a lot.my question is which enzyme is required for dehydroxylation at c3 of ribose

  7. Rupa

    Thank you so much for sharing this. Very helpful indeed. I would like to share this with my students.

  8. Ankita galgale

    Thank u so much for sharing this information with us.. It really helped me with my molecular biology work.

  9. Qurat

    Excellent answer

  10. Hi! the explanation you gave is really nice. inspired by this, I read couple of papers dealing with origin of DNA from RNA. Could it be possible that time of DNA formation coincided with time of origin of plant photosynthesis?
    Thanks a lot

    • Piter Keo

      Thanks for your comment!
      I don’t think so. Certainly DNA originated before the rising of the most recent common ancestor of all lifeforms and photosynthesis, as performed by plastids, seems to have evolved only once, in the lineage leading to modern Cyanobacteria and plastids.

  11. Joseph Caponi

    I’m glad my genetics professor goaded us into reading this, it was pretty interesting

  12. Dr. Naveeda Zaigham

    Excellent discussion. Very helpful indeed but I would only like to ask one question that if one nucleotide of DNA is more stable then how could the whole chain of DNA be weak when they are present collectively?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s