Monthly Archives: December 2012

Earthling Bulletin #12

by Piter Kehoma Boll and Rafael Nascimento

The new venomous primate species Nycticebus kayan. Photo by Chi'en C. Lee. Extracted from .wildborneo.com.my

The new venomous primate species Nycticebus kayan. Photo by Chi’en C. Lee. Extracted from wildborneo.com.my

News

Blog

Art

Scientific Articles

1 Comment

Filed under Bulletins

Does Retallack suffer from Williamson’s syndrome? The land-dwelling Ediacara controversy

by Piter Kehoma Boll

ResearchBlogging.orgAs you may have heard, or read, a paper published this month in Nature claims that the famous Ediacaran biota, a set of fossils from the Ediacaran Period (ca. 635-542 Mya) of the Neoproterozoic Era, is not composed by marine creatures, but rather land lichens. Who made this claim? Gregory Retallack, a geologist at the University of Oregon.

Retallack works on this hypothesis since the 1990s and the main evidences presented by him are related to geological features, like the red color of the rock, which according to him would have a terrestrial origin. Another claim is that if those creatures were soft-bodied animals, they wouldn’t have been so well preserved without compaction, as some fossils have tridimensional features.

Well, I am not a geologist and have no knowledge enough to argue about the geological point of view, neither am I an expert in the Ediacaran biota, but as a biologist I think I can share some thoughts.

First, as it seems, Retallack’s ideas are not accepted by most paleontologists. At the beginning, the innovative view of Ediacaran biota as land-dwelling was interesting, but the arguments to support it are not enough and there are still simpler and more possible explanations for the unusual features of the Ediacaran rocks. This didn’t stop Retallack to pursue in his idea, however, and other paleontologists are getting tired to go on reviewing his papers.

Does such a behavior look familiar? It kind of reminds me of Williamson, whom I talked about some time ago, as you can read here.

Just as Williamson insists in his hybridogenesis idea despite all facts pointing to other directions, so Retallack insists in his land-dwelling lichens hypothesis.

Dickinsonia would have been a land-dwelling lichen, according to Retallack. Photo by Wikipedia user Verisimilus. Extracted from en.wikipedia.org

Dickinsonia would have been a land-dwelling lichen, according to Retallack. Photo by Wikipedia user Verisimilus. Extracted from en.wikipedia.org

Retallack claims that fossils like Dickinsonia and Charnia, despite their bilaterally symmetrical body plan, were lichens. Does anybody know so well symmetrical lichens? And to support this hypothesis, he simply throws any kind of “fungian” explanation for all the fossils, considering the more radially symmetrical ones as bacterial colonies and the more animal-like as simply fungal fruiting bodies. And to explain things like the trace fossils, he talks about land slugs (land slugs during the Proterozoic? Really?) or slime moulds.

But then one might think: does he have any reference to support his ideas? And the answer is: of course, his OWN previous works. There are no other paleontologists claiming the same but himself. It looks just like a case of what I call Williamson’s syndrome.

I’m sure we will find some people supporting his idea, most probably laymen, and they will most certainly use the classical argument “all great scientific discoveries started by being rejected by most of the scientific community”. And I will say that again: Yes, many theories were initially rejected and later proven right, but you cannot forget that many more theories were rejected and later proven wrong. And once you prove that something is wrong or at least highly, highly unlikely, you must think of another possible and more likely explanations and not move on insisting on a fairytale.

– – –

References:

Cobb, M. 2012. The enigmatic Ediacaran biota just got more enigmatic. Or did it? Why Evolution Is True. Available online at <http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/the-enigmatic-ediacaran-biota-just-got-more-enigmatic-or-did-it/ >

Retallack, G. 2012. Ediacaran life on land. Nature. DOI: 10.1038/nature11777

Retallack, G. 2007. Growth, decay and burial compaction of Dickinsonia, an iconic Ediacaran fossil. Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, 31 (3), 215-240 DOI: 10.1080/03115510701484705

Switek, B. 2012. Controversial claim puts life on land 65 million years early. Nature. DOI: 10.1038/nature.2012.12017

4 Comments

Filed under Ecology, Evolution, Paleontology

Friday Fellow: American Cockroach

by Piter Kehoma Boll

ResearchBlogging.org Celebrating the end of the world, there would be no more suitable creature to be featured in our FF than the american cockroach, Periplaneta americana, so famous as a probable (or possible) survivor after a global cataclysm and, of course, as one of the most conspicuous house pests.

Despite its name, this species is not native from the United States or any country in the Americas, but was introduced from Africa and is nowadays common worldwide, especially in tropical climates. It favours dark and humid sites, like pipes, sewers, basements, etc. Even though more common in restaurants, grocery stores, bakeries, they can sometimes be found inside residences, usually coming from sewers via the plumbing at night.

American cockroach (Periplaneta americana). Photo by Wikimedia user Termiteman. Extracted from commons.wikimedia.org

American cockroach (Periplaneta americana). Photo by Wikimedia user Termiteman. Extracted from commons.wikimedia.org

What makes it so easy do adapt to many environments are its generalistic and opportunistic diet. American cockroaches can feed on almost everything, from all kinds of human food to paper, hair, cloth  and even shoes.

As this species moves from places  where human waste is disposed to food-storaging areas, it can become a public health problem, spreading more than 20 species of pathogenic organisms, including bacteria, virus, fungi, protozoans and helminthic worms. However, from another perspective, it’s ecological paper as a scavenger may be helping human sewers and other waste-conducting ways to stay functional by consuming detritus and preventing them to get obstructed.

Several management methods are known to reduce cockroach infestations, including insecticides or biological control through parasitoid wasps which lay their eggs inside the cockroach eggcases. Reducing moist areas around and inside buildings can also prevent infestations by removing sites that are attractive to these pests.

There are many divergences about the lifespan of american cockroaches, but it seems that it can live more than a thousand days since hatching and may survive more than a month without food and water.

Considering such aspects, it’s logical to assume that the american cockroach could easily survive a worldwide catastrophe and go on very well, maybe even getting advantages by the sudden increase in food availability from the corpses all around.

– – –

References:

Barbara, K. A. 2011. American Cockroach, Periplaneta americana (Linnaeus) (Insecta: Blattodea: Blattidae). University of Florida, IFAS Extension, 5 p.

Jones, S. C. 2008. American Cockroach. The Ohio State University, 3 p.

Vianna, E. E. S.; Berne, M. E. A. & Ribeiro, P. B. 2001. Desenvolvimento e longevidade de Periplaneta americana Linneu, 1758 (Blattodea: Blattidae). Revista Brasileira de Agrociências, 7 (2), 111-115

Leave a comment

Filed under Friday Fellow